Messages in Advanced-Passenger-Train group. Page 27 of 68.

Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1343 From: Alan Date: 20/09/2004
Subject: How many more times?
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1344 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 20/09/2004
Subject: Re: How many more times?
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1345 From: Adam Warr Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1346 From: Alan Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1347 From: Gerry Bates Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1348 From: Alan Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Poll results for Advanced-Passenger-Train
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1349 From: Paul Leadley Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Poll results for Advanced-Passenger-Train
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1350 From: Adam Warr Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1351 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Stupid Question ??
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1352 From: Andy Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Stupid Question ??
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1353 From: Kit Spackman Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: E Train Power Cars
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1354 From: Kit Spackman Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: ITV on APT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1355 From: Gerry Bates Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Channel 5 on APT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1356 From: modelefx@aol.com Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Virgin on BBC
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1357 From: apw6270 Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Re: Virgin on BBC
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1358 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Re: ITV on APT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1359 From: Kit Spackman Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Locking brakes
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1360 From: Alan Date: 23/09/2004
Subject: Re: Locking brakes
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1361 From: Kit Spackman Date: 23/09/2004
Subject: Locking brakes Pt II
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1362 From: Paul Leadley Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1363 From: Alan Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1365 From: Paul Leadley Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1366 From: Rob Latham Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1367 From: Paul Leadley Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1368 From: Rob Latham Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1369 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very near
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1370 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: TILT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1371 From: Andy Appleton Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: TILT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1372 From: Gerry Bates Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re[2]: TILT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1374 From: Kit Spackman Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: State of APTs
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1375 From: Nigel Richards Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1376 From: Adam Warr Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1377 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1378 From: Rob Latham Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1379 From: Adam Warr Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Fotopic Update - More APT Musings....
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1380 From: aarontaffera Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Vinyl Livery
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1381 From: Alan Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - More APT Musings....
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1382 From: Nigel Richards Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - More APT Musings....
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1383 From: Andy Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: APT-P on TV / Question
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1384 From: Rob Latham Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: Vinyl Livery
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1385 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Who owns APT ?
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1386 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: TILT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1387 From: Rob Latham Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: Who owns APT ?
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1388 From: Gerry Bates Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re[2]: TILT
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1389 From: Adam Warr Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Fotopic Update - APT Goes Retro!
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1390 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - APT Goes Retro!
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1391 From: Nick Wheat Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Here we go again
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1392 From: cityofderby Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1393 From: Rich Mackin Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - APT Goes Retro!
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1394 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: Here we go again



Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1343 From: Alan Date: 20/09/2004
Subject: How many more times?
Today's news: "The UK's first 125mph tilting train...":

http://www.itv.com/news/index_374502.html
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1344 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 20/09/2004
Subject: Re: How many more times?
I saw this on T.V typical press slated the APT project and put the same complaints about this project saying it was late and the trains were not meeting the target speed.
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 6:29 PM
Subject: <APT Group> How many more times?

Today's news: "The UK's first 125mph tilting train...":

  http://www.itv.com/news/index_374502.html


Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1345 From: Adam Warr Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
With tilting trains in the news again, I have turned my thoughts to how
the APT might have looked if it went into production in the mid-1980s.
The eventual train I have created here is very similar to the InterCity
225, though is fully tilting and built to the APT body profile.
Thoughts, please?

http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7719084.html

Getting tempted to convert some GF MkIVs now!!!

Regards,
Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
Electra Railway Graphics
www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
Fotopic Site:
http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1346 From: Alan Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
Nice. Now repaint them in GNER colours.

I am thinking of producing an APT-P in Virgin colours.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1347 From: Gerry Bates Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
Sorry, Adam, you weren't there first! Look at p106 of Hugh Williams' "APT: A Promise Unfulfilled".

Regards

Gerry Bates

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 21/09/04 at 10:34 Adam Warr wrote:

>With tilting trains in the news again, I have turned my thoughts to how
>the APT might have looked if it went into production in the mid-1980s.
>The eventual train I have created here is very similar to the InterCity
>225, though is fully tilting and built to the APT body profile.
>Thoughts, please?
>
>http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7719084.html
>
>Getting tempted to convert some GF MkIVs now!!!
>
>Regards,
>Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
>Electra Railway Graphics
>www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
>Fotopic Site:
>http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
>
>
>
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
>Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
>Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/9MtolB/TM
>--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Advanced-Passenger-Train/
>
><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    Advanced-Passenger-Train-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>This email has been verified as Virus free
>Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net



Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1348 From: Alan Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Poll results for Advanced-Passenger-Train
If one voted correctly, what prize does one get?
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1349 From: Paul Leadley Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Poll results for Advanced-Passenger-Train
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........................

I will have them to think on that one.

Maybe I will tell those luck people a time and a place!

Regards

Paul
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1350 From: Adam Warr Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT
Hi Gerry,

Damn! My source has been exposed!!!!

Regards,
Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
Electra Railway Graphics
www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
Fotopic Site:
http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerry Bates [mailto:gerry@...]
Sent: 21 September 2004 11:39
To: Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: <APT Group> Fotopic Update - Flights of Fancy...APT


Sorry, Adam, you weren't there first! Look at p106 of Hugh Williams'
"APT: A Promise Unfulfilled".

Regards

Gerry Bates

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 21/09/04 at 10:34 Adam Warr wrote:

>With tilting trains in the news again, I have turned my thoughts to how
>the APT might have looked if it went into production in the mid-1980s.
>The eventual train I have created here is very similar to the InterCity
>225, though is fully tilting and built to the APT body profile.
>Thoughts, please?
>
>http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7719084.html
>
>Getting tempted to convert some GF MkIVs now!!!
>
>Regards,
>Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
>Electra Railway Graphics
>www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
>Fotopic Site:
>http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
>
>
>
>

>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>This email has been verified as Virus free
>Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT






Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Advanced-Passenger-Train/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Advanced-Passenger-Train-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1351 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Stupid Question ??
Hi I'm new to this group but have what might be a stupid question
(here goes)

Will the APT-E powercars fit under that low bridge ? it looked mighty
tight on the video

Ralph
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1352 From: Andy Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: Re: Stupid Question ??
Welcome to the group Ralph,

I was also thinking (worrying!) about PC1 & PC2 fitting under the
low bridge, which begs the question: Are the power cars being moved
to Shildon by road????

We'll just have to wait & see!
Andy


--- Original Message ---

Hi I'm new to this group but have what might be a stupid question
(here goes)

Will the APT-E powercars fit under that low bridge ? it looked
mighty tight on the video.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1353 From: Kit Spackman Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: E Train Power Cars
Ralph,

>Will the APT-E powercars fit under that low bridge ? it looked mighty
>tight on the video<

No, that's why they are being towed across to the Thrall site to be put on
road trailers.

TC1 had about 1/2" of clearance under the bridge as it stood, so PC1 and 2
stand no chance.

Regards
Kit
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1354 From: Kit Spackman Date: 21/09/2004
Subject: ITV on APT
I got really tee'd off by the usual media rubbish about 'first 125 mph
tilting trains' so I emailed ITV as below. I bet I don't get a reply of any
sort................

---------------------------------------

'The UK's first 125mph tilting train has made the trip..................'

ref :- http://www.itv.com/news/britain_374502.html

In a word, rubbish..............

The UK's first 125 mph tilting train was the Advanced Passenger Train,
wholly British designed, built and developed, and it first ran in passenger
service on 7th December 1981. I know because I was one of the only 13 fare
paying passengers on board and I still have the ticket to prove it.

The APT-P may well have had it's problems, but it was running at 125 mph,
and tilting, over 20 years ago. After the initial troublesome period, well
publicised by the media, the APT-P ran to schedule and quite reliably, but
of course this was ignored by the media, as usual.

Please get your facts straight in future.

And yes, I am wholly biased about the APT (see suffix to my signature....)

Kit Spackman
(former tilt system development engineer APT-E)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1355 From: Gerry Bates Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Channel 5 on APT
Below is my email to channel 5 after they rubbished the APT by saying it failed because it made the passengers sick.
 
Cheers
 
Gerry Bates

I was very disappointed at the comments made by the news reader during the Channel 5 News bulletin at 5:30 today, likening the Virgin tilting trains to Thomas the Tank Engine in comparison with the French and Japanese high speed trains - "It may look more like Thomas the Tank Engine . . . "

Anyone who has seen a Pendolino will know that it gives away nothing in terms of stylistic design and stands comparison with any train in the world.

Unfortunately, that jibe was followed by seriously inaccurate and misleading comments about BR's attempts to produce a high speed tilting train, the APT. The APT failed because the government of the day refused to back further development at a stage when all the engineering problems inherent in such a huge step-change in technology were practically ironed out. It is significant that work on the APT contributed to the design of the trains now providing the high speed services on the East Coast Line from Kings Cross to Leeds and Edinburgh.

The stories about APT making people sick arose from press trips in the early days of trails. Some put them down to journalists having enjoyed the hospitality a bit too much but the truth is probably that the tilting system was too good in that it compensated completely for the effects of curves. Motion sickness is caused by the eye and the inner ear receiving conflicting messages. The inner ear told the brain that everything was completely stable whilst the eye sent the message that the horizon and the rest of the world outside the window were tilting backwards and forwards.

These days, and in the latter days of APT development, it has been realised that there should be less than 100% compensation so that the effect of cornering is still felt slightly and the eye and the inner ear are in agreement.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1356 From: modelefx@aol.com Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Virgin on BBC
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1357 From: apw6270 Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Re: Virgin on BBC
...locking brakes? What is it with tilting trains and locking brakes?
The two seem to go together like ham and eggs.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1358 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Re: ITV on APT
WELL SAID!. I was annoyed at the bbc news comments!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:52 PM
Subject: <APT Group> ITV on APT

I got really tee'd off by the usual media rubbish about 'first 125 mph
tilting trains' so I emailed ITV as below. I bet I don't get a reply of any
sort................

---------------------------------------

'The UK's first 125mph tilting train has made the trip..................'

ref :- http://www.itv.com/news/britain_374502.html

In a word, rubbish..............

The UK's first 125 mph tilting train was the Advanced Passenger Train,
wholly British designed, built and developed, and it first ran in passenger
service on 7th December 1981. I know because I was one of the only 13 fare
paying passengers on board and I still have the ticket to prove it.

The APT-P may well have had it's problems, but it was running at 125 mph,
and tilting, over 20 years ago. After the initial troublesome period, well
publicised by the media, the APT-P ran to schedule and quite reliably, but
of course this was ignored by the media, as usual.

Please get your facts straight in future.

And yes, I am wholly biased about the APT (see suffix to my signature....)

Kit Spackman
(former tilt system development engineer APT-E)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1359 From: Kit Spackman Date: 22/09/2004
Subject: Locking brakes
>...locking brakes? What is it with tilting trains and locking brakes?
>The two seem to go together like ham and eggs.<

They do, well almost anyway.

You don't need tilt if you're going to go slow, so by definition almost all
tilting trains are quick. Quick trains, especially tilting ones, need to
run on tracks with slow trains so they need to stop faster than a normal
train. Therefore the liklihood of locking brakes are much greater.

Gerry, an excellent response, nice one. <g>

Regards
Kit
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1360 From: Alan Date: 23/09/2004
Subject: Re: Locking brakes
Sure, I understand your point: Tilting trains tilt to maintain
passenger comfort whilst cornering at high than normal speeds, and
obviously the higher speeds require greater braking effort.

But this is not new. Each time railway speeds have increased, newer
better brakes have been required. Both APT-E and APT-P increased
railway speeds significantly and thus required a newer better brake,
and unsurprisingly both suffered a degree of brake problems, but that
was over 20 years ago.

I am very surprised that with today's computers, with past
experience
and knowledge, and the fact that the Virgin Pendolinos are not new
technology nor do they significantly increase railway speeds, that
locking brakes are still a problem.

I get the feeling that in the coming weeks we will see a picture of a
Pendolino with a tilt failure.

Uh oh – I think I'm starting to sound like the press.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1361 From: Kit Spackman Date: 23/09/2004
Subject: Locking brakes Pt II
Alan,

>I am very surprised that with today's computers, with past experience and
knowledge, and the fact >that the Virgin Pendolinos are not new technology
nor do they significantly increase railway >speeds, that locking brakes are
still a problem.<

The problem may lie in the UK's archaic track and signal infrastructure.
We're still living with very short sections between signals, comparitively
speaking, which require the trains to stop very quickly. Of course the
ultimate limiting factor is still the steel wheel on steel rails, not
exactly the highest friction match on the planet. The combination of the
two results in almost impossible demands on the brakes.

At one stage APT-P was planned to use 'double block' working, needing twice
the distance to stop in, but that required in-cab signalling which never
got off the ground properly. Why that isn't used now I've no idea, it
should be a doddle with todays technology.

If they can put down umpteen transponders to tell the train when to tilt
and when not to I'd have thought that additional ones to tell it to stop or
not stop wouldn't be too difficult, but then I'm only a hydraulics
engineer.......... <g>

Regards
Kit
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1362 From: Paul Leadley Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Hi all,
As of Tuesday this week, the E train is now back together again.

PC1 and PC2 are now sharing a common bogie, although due to a reason
I haven't had time time look into yet, the drawbars dont meet.

Ive taken some pictures and video and will try and update the
website over the weekend, also to include the splitting of the rest
of the train.

Regards

Paul
APT-E Conservation & Support Group

PS. Well Done to everyone who guest right in the pole!
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1363 From: Alan Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Hey, that's unfair - Ian Ellis wasn't just 'warm' he was bang-on.

I too thought that PC1 and PC2 would be joined together, before Ian
Ellis posted his suggestions, but after they were described as
merely 'warm' I abandoned the idea.

Tut, sigh.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1365 From: Paul Leadley Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Well true, BUT..................

ok, I will spill the beans...............are you ready.

E train is going to be shunted out of the NRM, up the ECML, under
Clifton bridge, a distance of about three miles, then crossed over
so that it can be return shunted into Thralls yard, at which point
the train will be split again and low loaded.

Gonna be on the train when that happens........with luck, as we need
to keep an eye on the steering beams and the gauge.

We need to get the drawbar connected before this can happen.

Well it got you all going for a week or so.

Regards

Paul


--- In Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com, "Alan" <yahoo@h...>
wrote:
> Hey, that's unfair - Ian Ellis wasn't just 'warm' he was bang-on.
>
> I too thought that PC1 and PC2 would be joined together, before
Ian
> Ellis posted his suggestions, but after they were described as
> merely 'warm' I abandoned the idea.
>
> Tut, sigh.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1366 From: Rob Latham Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Hi Paul

By that I guess that E-Train won't be at Shildon for the opening day
tomorrow ? - if not I'll abandon my plan to visit.

Also do you know if the P-Train power car has been painted yet ?

Best Wishes


Rob
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1367 From: Paul Leadley Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Hi Rob,
No, she will not be there until the mid - later part of next month,
mainly because the old girl didnt want to come apart after all this
time.

TC1 and TC2 are already there so just waiting for the powercars.

Sadly no, the P train powercar hasnt been painted, as far as I know.

I am gonna go to Shildon when she gets there, thats unless Im
invited to put her back together again, which we havent yet!!!!

Regards

Paul
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1368 From: Rob Latham Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
Hi Paul

thanks for your quick response - I'll delay my visit then ! - perhaps
come when you start having work days there ?

Rob
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1369 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very near
We all know that the APT-P powercar at shildon needs to be repainted (personally I think it should be put back with the rest of P-train as this is the only surviving unit).  I was looking on the web at the APT-P at Crewe.  She was repainted and apprantly restored but looking at the pictures shes in a real state.  One nose has no tranferes which should say "intercity APT" and the paint is all faded and coming of.  As this is the last APT-P to survive surely it should not be left like this?  What makes it worse it that I found these pics on a German and a Japanese website about tilting trains and the BR intercity, E-train was up there as well.  It seems to me that the rest of the world recognise the importance the APT project and trains had on high speed rail travel why can't the British.  I feel that APT-P should be put undercover and maintained.  If the steam trains etc can be kept shiny and looking like new then why can P-train especially as people spent money and time to bring her upto a respectable condition, and I hope that after her repaint E-train will not be allowed to get into a state!!
 
By the way the APT-P website showing the restoration of P-train seems to have stopped being updated, did the restoration ever get fully completed?  I personally would like to see the p-train in an oporational state.
 
Brian
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: <APT Group> Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.

Hi Rob,
No, she will not be there until the mid - later part of next month,
mainly because the old girl didnt want to come apart after all this
time.

TC1 and TC2 are already there so just waiting for the powercars.

Sadly no, the P train powercar hasnt been painted, as far as I know.

I am gonna go to Shildon when she gets there, thats unless Im
invited to put her back together again, which we havent yet!!!!

Regards

Paul



Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1370 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: TILT
How do Pendolinos and Super Voyagers know how much to tilt ? do the
balises tell them ? or do they have some sort of sensor on board like
the APT-P (I've looked at http://www.apt-p.com/apttiltsystem.htm )

Many thanks


Ralph
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1371 From: Andy Appleton Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re: TILT
Ralph, see message 1167:
 
 
Andy
----- Original Message -----
 
How do Pendolinos and Super Voyagers know how much to tilt ? do the
balises tell them ? or do they have some sort of sensor on board like
the APT-P (I've looked at http://www.apt-p.com/apttiltsystem.htm )

Many thanks
Ralph
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1372 From: Gerry Bates Date: 24/09/2004
Subject: Re[2]: TILT
Andy and Ralph
 
Message 1167 could be a bit misleading in response to Ralph's query.
 
Although the balises give permission to tilt they don't say how much to tilt, since that would depend on speed.
 
Permission is required because not all sites have the clearances necessary for tilt.
 
The amount of tilt is decided by information from on-board sensors.
 
Regards
 
Gerry Bates

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 24/09/04 at 16:46 Andy Appleton wrote:
Ralph, see message 1167:
 
 
Andy
----- Original Message -----
 
How do Pendolinos and Super Voyagers know how much to tilt ? do the
balises tell them ? or do they have some sort of sensor on board like
the APT-P (I've looked at http://www.apt-p.com/apttiltsystem.htm )

Many thanks
Ralph


-- 
This email has been verified as Virus free
Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net

Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1374 From: Kit Spackman Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: State of APTs
Brian,

> As this is the last APT-P to survive surely it should not be left like
this? <

In a word, money...........

I'm sure Rob will have something to say about this too, but the primary
reason is that there isn't anyone who has enough spare money and the wil to
use it to restore the P-Train.

>It seems to me that the rest of the world recognise the importance the APT
project and trains had >on high speed rail travel why can't the British. <

Because successive Governments don't give a fig for Britain's engineering
capability, let alone it's heritage. If Maggie Thatcher even knew what
'Advanced Passenger Train' meant we wouldn't be in the state we are now.

>I feel that APT-P should be put undercover and maintained. If the steam
trains etc can be kept >shiny and looking like new then why can P-train
especially as people spent money and time to >bring her upto a respectable
condit!ion<

Because there aren't enough people with enough money to care.

>and I hope that after her repaint E-train will not be allowed to get into
a state!!<

Same answer. The NRM didn't give a fig for E-Train's state for 26 years. If
Paul hadn't badgered them time and time again she'd probably have been
scrapped by now, and even that would have been 'covered up'. The Support
Group are seen as nuisances at York, I'm sure many of the staff there are
only too glad to see E-Train en route to Shildon as they won't have to 'put
up' with her or us any more. The repaint was only done because there was an
open day coming up, and only Paul's trickery with the primer blothes got
the bogies painted even then!

>I personally would like to see the p-train in an oporational state.<

Wouldn't we all? But the answer lies in my tirade above, money.

Sorry to be so negative, but it REALLY makes me mad when such important
artifacts are treated like junk by the very people who are charged with
looking after them.

Regards
Kit
<pissed-off mode off........>
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1375 From: Nigel Richards Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
i agree with brian and most of you about the apt-p train. i think that
shildon should have also had the apt-p with the apt-e trains together
undercover. i know the apt-e train is now at shildont well i think its all
in there now. but the apt-p looks as if its rotting away. To be very honest
i feel a little ashamed about the current govenment and past ones as they
say things with good intention then when they get into power they dont want
to know about anything espeically the current state of the railway network.
if this govenment was like say france or the netherlands then the
railnetwork would be far better maintained and even if old equipment like
the apt-p which is a heritage piece of engineering and a mile stone in
railway history would be maintained and kept under cover.

nigel

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kit Spackman" <101453.3657@...>
To: <Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 12:23 AM
Subject: <APT Group> State of APTs


> Brian,
>
>> As this is the last APT-P to survive surely it should not be left like
> this? <
>
> In a word, money...........
>
> I'm sure Rob will have something to say about this too, but the primary
> reason is that there isn't anyone who has enough spare money and the wil
> to
> use it to restore the P-Train.
>
>>It seems to me that the rest of the world recognise the importance the APT
> project and trains had >on high speed rail travel why can't the British. <
>
> Because successive Governments don't give a fig for Britain's engineering
> capability, let alone it's heritage. If Maggie Thatcher even knew what
> 'Advanced Passenger Train' meant we wouldn't be in the state we are now.
>
>>I feel that APT-P should be put undercover and maintained. If the steam
> trains etc can be kept >shiny and looking like new then why can P-train
> especially as people spent money and time to >bring her upto a respectable
> condit!ion<
>
> Because there aren't enough people with enough money to care.
>
>>and I hope that after her repaint E-train will not be allowed to get into
> a state!!<
>
> Same answer. The NRM didn't give a fig for E-Train's state for 26 years.
> If
> Paul hadn't badgered them time and time again she'd probably have been
> scrapped by now, and even that would have been 'covered up'. The Support
> Group are seen as nuisances at York, I'm sure many of the staff there are
> only too glad to see E-Train en route to Shildon as they won't have to
> 'put
> up' with her or us any more. The repaint was only done because there was
> an
> open day coming up, and only Paul's trickery with the primer blothes got
> the bogies painted even then!
>
>>I personally would like to see the p-train in an oporational state.<
>
> Wouldn't we all? But the answer lies in my tirade above, money.
>
> Sorry to be so negative, but it REALLY makes me mad when such important
> artifacts are treated like junk by the very people who are charged with
> looking after them.
>
> Regards
> Kit
> <pissed-off mode off........>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 23/09/2004
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1376 From: Adam Warr Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
I totally agree with your sentiments there, Kit. One thing I noticed
whilst working on the E Train at the NRM was the shocking state of some
of the other coaches and wagons parked alongside (pre-Railfest).

In particular, there was a fascinating ex-LMS test coach literally
rotting away to nothing, both inside and out. I hope the new building at
Shildon will allow these vehicles to be restored properly, as I'm sure
they all have a story to tell.

The same goes for the P-Train power car - when repainted and restored
much can be made of the evolution from the E-Train to the P-Train and
ultimatly the IC225 and Class 91. It's a golden opportunity to put the
record straight and show folk that the project wasn't the failure as
portrayed by the media and politicos of the day.

Regards,
Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
Electra Railway Graphics
www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
Fotopic Site:
http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/

-----Original Message-----
From: Kit Spackman [mailto:101453.3657@...]
Sent: 25 September 2004 00:24
To: INTERNET:Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com
Subject: <APT Group> State of APTs


Brian,

> As this is the last APT-P to survive surely it should not be left like
this? <

In a word, money...........

I'm sure Rob will have something to say about this too, but the primary
reason is that there isn't anyone who has enough spare money and the wil
to use it to restore the P-Train.

>It seems to me that the rest of the world recognise the importance the
>APT
project and trains had >on high speed rail travel why can't the British.
<

Because successive Governments don't give a fig for Britain's
engineering capability, let alone it's heritage. If Maggie Thatcher even
knew what 'Advanced Passenger Train' meant we wouldn't be in the state
we are now.

>I feel that APT-P should be put undercover and maintained. If the
>steam
trains etc can be kept >shiny and looking like new then why can P-train
especially as people spent money and time to >bring her upto a
respectable condit!ion<

Because there aren't enough people with enough money to care.

>and I hope that after her repaint E-train will not be allowed to get
>into
a state!!<

Same answer. The NRM didn't give a fig for E-Train's state for 26 years.
If Paul hadn't badgered them time and time again she'd probably have
been scrapped by now, and even that would have been 'covered up'. The
Support Group are seen as nuisances at York, I'm sure many of the staff
there are only too glad to see E-Train en route to Shildon as they won't
have to 'put up' with her or us any more. The repaint was only done
because there was an open day coming up, and only Paul's trickery with
the primer blothes got the bogies painted even then!

>I personally would like to see the p-train in an oporational state.<

Wouldn't we all? But the answer lies in my tirade above, money.

Sorry to be so negative, but it REALLY makes me mad when such important
artifacts are treated like junk by the very people who are charged with
looking after them.

Regards
Kit
<pissed-off mode off........>




Yahoo! Groups Links
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1377 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
Kit.
 
I fully appreciate the fact that money is a all to common an issue.  Its a shame that theres money to be found to build steam railways, restore the old steam trains etc, but non for APT-P or E-train.
 
English Heritage seems to be kept for old buildings and not much more.  Surely this is not right :-( 
 
Pete Waterman put up money for P-Train. 
 
I feel that as one of the younger people interested in the APT project but am too young to know the story it should be kept in a reasonable state for my generation and my childrens generation (when they come) to learn.
 
I say make those who let these artifacts rot pay for their restoration and upkeep :-) after all these trains were put in the care of NRM and Crewe for a record of history, note the word CARE
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 12:23 AM
Subject: <APT Group> State of APTs

Brian,

> As this is the last APT-P to survive surely it should not be left like
this? <

In a word, money...........

I'm sure Rob will have something to say about this too, but the primary
reason is that there isn't anyone who has enough spare money and the wil to
use it to restore the P-Train.

>It seems to me that the rest of the world recognise the importance the APT
project and trains had >on high speed rail travel why can't the British. <

Because successive Governments don't give a fig for Britain's engineering
capability, let alone it's heritage. If Maggie Thatcher even knew what
'Advanced Passenger Train' meant we wouldn't be in the state we are now.

>I feel that APT-P should be put undercover and maintained.  If the steam
trains etc can be kept >shiny and looking like new then why can P-train
especially as people spent money and time to >bring her upto a respectable
condit!ion<

Because there aren't enough people with enough money to care.

>and I hope that after her repaint E-train will not be allowed to get into
a state!!<

Same answer. The NRM didn't give a fig for E-Train's state for 26 years. If
Paul hadn't badgered them time and time again she'd probably have been
scrapped by now, and even that would have been 'covered up'. The Support
Group are seen as nuisances at York, I'm sure many of the staff there are
only too glad to see E-Train en route to Shildon as they won't have to 'put
up' with her or us any more. The repaint was only done because there was an
open day coming up, and only Paul's  trickery with the primer blothes got
the bogies painted even then!

>I personally would like to see the p-train in an oporational state.<

Wouldn't we all? But the answer lies in my tirade above, money.

Sorry to be so negative, but it REALLY makes me mad when such important
artifacts are treated like junk by the very people who are charged with
looking after them.

Regards
Kit
<pissed-off mode off........>

Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1378 From: Rob Latham Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: PC1 and PC2 joined at last, well very very nearly.
About the repaint kindly sponsored by Sir Richard Branson's Virgin
company APT-P has got the Intercity APT logo on both DTSs - the
warning yellow paint has faded with two years out in the open -
nothing that a good clean wouldn't cure. (any volunteers??)

For before and after pictures of the repaint see -
http://www.apt-p.com/APTPRepaintBeforeAndAfter.htm


The powercar however, as can be seen from the photo's recently
uploaded to the photo's section of this group, does once again have
paint peeling from one side. We have had several 'experts' from the
paint industry look at it and none have come up with a solution - one
even suggested wrapping the whole PC in vinyl in the correct livery !


With regard to the German and Japanese websites let me know where you
found these pictures and I'll tell you when they were taken.


Again as Kit has said the main problem is lack of money / undercover
accomodation - I would love to see P Train in 'operational' state and
stored undercover but The Railway Age gets no funding other than gate
receipts and donations. Any millionaires lottery winners please make
cheques out to 'The Railway Age' !!


If there is room at Shildon I'd love to see APT-P along side APT-E !


Rob
www.apt-p.com
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1379 From: Adam Warr Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Fotopic Update - More APT Musings....
This time it's a Class 370 APT-P in INTERCITY Swallow and Virgin
Liveries and a GNER 91 with a difference...

Picture Here:
http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7834511.html

Regards,
Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
Electra Railway Graphics
www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
Fotopic Site:
http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1380 From: aarontaffera Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Vinyl Livery
This site claims vinyl is 1/3 the cost of paint. 3M is a huge global
company; maybe they would be willing to help out, even if it were
for one APT vehicle at a time, say starting with the power car. It
would be good PR for 3M.


http://authoring.3m.com/cms/GB/en/2-98/cFeFiFT/view.jhtml

"3M™ Controltac™ Graphic Film, an opaque vinyl which is
sufficiently flexible to conform to both smooth and irregular
surfaces, was used 30 years ago by BR for the Inter-City logo. The
vinyl revolution began in March 1999 when the cost benefit of using
vinyl instead of paint was presented by 3M to WAGN for their
proposed c2c livery replacement. 3M demonstrated total coverage of a
carriage at approximately a third of the cost of metallic spray
painting."
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1381 From: Alan Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - More APT Musings....
Oooooo, very nice.
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1382 From: Nigel Richards Date: 25/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - More APT Musings....
that is very nice indeed adam good on yea
nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Warr" <adam.warr@...>
To: <ngauge@yahoogroups.com>; <demodellers@yahoogroups.com>;
<Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 5:02 PM
Subject: <APT Group> Fotopic Update - More APT Musings....


> This time it's a Class 370 APT-P in INTERCITY Swallow and Virgin
> Liveries and a GNER 91 with a difference...
>
> Picture Here:
> http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7834511.html
>
> Regards,
> Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
> Electra Railway Graphics
> www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
> Fotopic Site:
> http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.769 / Virus Database: 516 - Release Date: 24/09/2004
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1383 From: Andy Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: APT-P on TV / Question
I have since found out that the TV program mentioned below
was "Extreme Machines - Metal Monsters". This episode was on TV
yesterday morning (Sat) so I taped it as I was going out at the
time. I've just watched it and here's what Pete Waterman had to say
about the APT-P:

"They actually gave us this to get rid of it because their were to
many journalists taking pictures of it in a scrap yard and we had to
hide it for ten years, we had to physically hide it!, so nobody
could see it. That was our part of the deal with British Rail that
nobody could see it".

I don't know when the interview with Pete Waterman took place but it
was definitely before the P-train was repainted in June 2002.

Take Care,
Andy


---Original Message---

> Hi,
>
> I have just spoken to a friend of mine who said that the APT-P was
on TV last night, Tues. It was on 'Discovery Science' just before
8pm.
>
> He said that he only caught the last few minutes of the program
which showed some archive footage of the P-train that he has never
seen before, also, more interestingly it showed an interview with
Pete Waterman at the Railway Age, Crewe. Pete was talking about the
APT project & said that when BR passed the P-train onto the Railway
Age one of the conditions was that it mustn't be shown to anyone for
ten years - especially the Germans as they were after the tilting
technology - this is the first time I have heard this, did anyone
else see the TV program / can anyone confirm Pete Waterman's
statement?
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1384 From: Rob Latham Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: Vinyl Livery
Hi There

it was indeed Halo Graphics who suggested wrapping our powercar in
preprinted vinyl.

Perhaps that would have been a longer lasting solution ? - although
I'd be against it as it wasn't how it was done when in service.


Rob
www.apt-p.com




--- In Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com, "aarontaffera"
<aarontaffera@y...> wrote:
> This site claims vinyl is 1/3 the cost of paint. 3M is a huge
global
> company; maybe they would be willing to help out, even if it were
> for one APT vehicle at a time, say starting with the power car. It
> would be good PR for 3M.
>
>
> http://authoring.3m.com/cms/GB/en/2-98/cFeFiFT/view.jhtml
>
> "3M™ Controltac™ Graphic Film, an opaque vinyl which is
> sufficiently flexible to conform to both smooth and irregular
> surfaces, was used 30 years ago by BR for the Inter-City logo. The
> vinyl revolution began in March 1999 when the cost benefit of using
> vinyl instead of paint was presented by 3M to WAGN for their
> proposed c2c livery replacement. 3M demonstrated total coverage of
a
> carriage at approximately a third of the cost of metallic spray
> painting."
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1385 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Who owns APT ?
who should we write to about the 'care' of APT ?

Ralph
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1386 From: ralphhodgeson Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: TILT
> The amount of tilt is decided by information from on-board sensors.
>
> Regards
>
> Gerry Bates
>

Gerry,

what sort of sensors are they ??


Ralph
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1387 From: Rob Latham Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re: Who owns APT ?
Ralph

the APT-P vehicles currently at The Railway Age in Crewe are owned by
Crewe Heritage Trust. They could not however be sold on, without
first offering them first to the National Railway Museum and then
British Railways Board.

To write to the trustees address your letter


Crewe Heritage Trust
The Railway Age
Vernon Way
Crewe
CW1 2DB


Best wishes

Rob
www.apt-p.com
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1388 From: Gerry Bates Date: 26/09/2004
Subject: Re[2]: TILT
Ralph

Kit can speak with more authority than me, of course, but the sensors will be accelerometers - measuring lateral acceleration.

When a body moves in a curve it requires a constant acceleration towards the centre of the curve. The tilt system doesn't cancel that acceleration, merely moves it to an apparently vertical axis and we don't feel thrown sideways. But the lateral acceleration measured by the sensors is cancelled out - or most of it (it's useful to have a little residual lateral acceleration to prevent motion sickness).

To the passenger, going through a horizontal curve with tilt in operation is really like going through a vertical curve in terms of the forces on the body.

Gerry

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 26/09/04 at 12:39 ralphhodgeson wrote:

>> The amount of tilt is decided by information from on-board sensors.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Gerry Bates
>>
>
>Gerry,
>
>what sort of sensors are they ??
>
>
>Ralph
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
>Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
>Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/9MtolB/TM
>--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Advanced-Passenger-Train/
>
><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    Advanced-Passenger-Train-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>This email has been verified as Virus free
>Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net



Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1389 From: Adam Warr Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Fotopic Update - APT Goes Retro!
Yet another look at the APT - this time turning the clock back to
pre-InterCity days...

http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7891263.html

Regards,
Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
Electra Railway Graphics
www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
Fotopic Site:
http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1390 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - APT Goes Retro!
Hows about the pullman livery??
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Warr
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:58 PM
Subject: <APT Group> Fotopic Update - APT Goes Retro!

Yet another look at the APT - this time turning the clock back to
pre-InterCity days...

http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7891263.html

Regards,
Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
Electra Railway Graphics
www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
Fotopic Site:
http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/



Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1391 From: Nick Wheat Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Here we go again
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1392 From: cityofderby Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: State of APTs
--- In Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com, Kit Spackman
<101453.3657@c...> wrote:
> >I personally would like to see the p-train in an oporational
state.<

> Wouldn't we all? But the answer lies in my tirade above, money.

Going back to the E train, I have looked at the pictures on the
website showing the visible decay, but have not seen much information
on the condition of the actual 'works'.

Could the power cars ever be restarted and moved under their own
power, or have the turbines/motors/axles completely seized/rusted up
over the years?

(ab)
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1393 From: Rich Mackin Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: Fotopic Update - APT Goes Retro!
Only one left is LMS 'Coronation Scot' livery :)

-Rich-

--- In Advanced-Passenger-Train@yahoogroups.com, "Adam Warr"
<adam.warr@n...> wrote:
> Yet another look at the APT - this time turning the clock back to
> pre-InterCity days...
>
> http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/p7891263.html
>
> Regards,
> Adam Warr, Peterborough UK
> Electra Railway Graphics
> www.electrarailwaygraphics.co.uk
> Fotopic Site:
> http://www.adamsphotos.fotopic.net/
Group: Advanced-Passenger-Train Message: 1394 From: Brian Johnson Pianos Date: 27/09/2004
Subject: Re: Here we go again
History repeats!!
 
Emailing seems to be useless.  I saw the virgin site and there is an elemeant in these articles.
 
Was not the APT-P the first passenger train to reach 125mph?? and was the track set up for APT to tilt around corners allowing the train to run at an average higher speed??
 
Being 28 I do not know the full story, but from this group this is what I understand yet the press and Virgin site gives a different outlook
 
If the APT was the first then why is it all quiet, or did the media kill the project that badly??
 
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Wheat
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 4:07 PM
Subject: <APT Group> Here we go again

The media chortling didn't take long...

http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/viewarticle.aspx?id=139235

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3693808.stm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,1271,-4517857,00.html

Nick